I’m getting increasingly frustrated with the lack of any valid information in the US news media.
On February 4, 2014 a leaked audio between Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt was released to youtube:
In this audio transcript, which you can find here:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957
Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt are deciding on who will control the Ukrainian government. Again, the audio was leaked on February 4, 2014. They decided that Arseniy Yatseniuk would replace Oleksandr Turchynov as prime minister.
Voice thought to be Pyatt's: I think we're in play. The Klitschko [Vitaly Klitschko, one of three main opposition leaders] piece is obviously the complicated electron here. Especially the announcement of him as deputy prime minister and you've seen some of my notes on the troubles in the marriage right now so we're trying to get a read really fast on where he is on this stuff. But I think your argument to him, which you'll need to make, I think that's the next phone call you want to set up, is exactly the one you made to Yats [Arseniy Yatseniuk, another opposition leader]. And I'm glad you sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario. And I'm very glad that he said what he said in response.
This is precisely who became the next prime minister of Ukraine, on February, 27, 2014.
The former president, Viktor Yanukovych fled from office on February, 22 2014. The office of the presidency remained vacant until Petro Poroshenko took office on June 7, 2014.
I don’t see why (or frankly how) Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt would be picking out the next government of Ukraine, 2 weeks and 4 days before Yanukovych fled office, unless they were part of the coup.
In addition, once the government fell, Ukraine fell into civil war nearly immediately. Jens Stoltenberg even said that war began in 2014 between Russia and Ukraine:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WzLz7kPjus1F/
(Is there any way to embed bitchute videos?)
And our own media used to even cover the Ukrainian civil war:
https://www.cnn.com/2014/09/02/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/index.html
Is there any other possible explanation than a coup? If this was a coup, it’s the fault of the United States there’s a war between Ukraine and Russia.
This appears to be a proxy war at this point, in which case, the goal of each side in the conflict which really is the United States versus Russia, is to exhaust the resources of the other. The assumption of the United States is they have unlimited money to fund this war, since they just print money at will. The assumption of Russia is that they will continue this war and devalue the dollar since Europe, Russia, and India, are dependent upon Russian energy as well as Ukrainian grain.
Who thinks I’m incorrect? If I am, please correct my reasoning and point out my errors so I can also correct.
I have heard that 600,000 Ukrainians are dead now as a result of this tragic war, more than a million injured. Good lord, I hope this isn't true. What a terrible terrible tragedy of it is true. I will have to remember to check up on these claims in a few years. I beg god that I'm merely being misinformed. If it's that many people, I don't think Ukraine can survive as a nation.
How interesting. Substack has claimed I've been engaging in spam.
IF I have, and I haven't as far as I know, done this. Suspiciously, there's no example, there's no link, it's just a claim, and I'm used to claims that I've violated terms of service but they always lack examples.
The Internet was designed, specifically, to end propaganda. Companies that continue to engage in this practice, we will destroy in time. It's a lot easier to tell the truth than it is to construct a lie. Lies are self contradictory almost always. Any story just about has a plot hole, same thing with propaganda.